Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Artikel 50 - Recht, wegen derselben Straftat nicht zweimal strafrechtlich verfolgt oder bestraft zu werden

Artikel 50 - Recht, wegen derselben Straftat nicht zweimal strafrechtlich verfolgt oder bestraft zu werden

Niemand darf wegen einer Straftat, derentwegen er bereits in der Union nach dem Gesetz rechtskräftig verurteilt oder freigesprochen worden ist, in einem Strafverfahren erneut verfolgt oder bestraft werden.

    • Text:

      Artikel 4 des Protokolls Nr. 7 zur EMRK lautet wie folgt:

      `1. Niemand darf wegen einer Straftat, wegen der er bereits nach dem Gesetz und dem Strafverfahrensrecht eines Staates rechtskräftig verurteilt oder freigesprochen worden ist, in einem Strafverfahren desselben Staates erneut verfolgt oder bestraft werden.

      2. Absatz 1 schließt die Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens nach dem Gesetz und dem Strafverfahrensrecht des betreffenden Staates nicht aus, falls neue oder neu bekannt gewordene Tatsachen vorliegen oder das vorausgegangene Verfahren schwere, den Ausgang des Verfahrens berührende Mängel aufweist.

      3. Von diesem Artikel darf nicht nach Artikel 15 der Konvention abgewichen werden.`

      Die Regel `ne bis in idem` wird im Unionsrecht angewandt (siehe in der umfangreichen Rechtsprechung Urteil vom 5. Mai 1966, Rechtssachen 18/65 und 35/65, Gutmann gegen Kommission, Slg. 1966, 150, und in jüngerer Zeit Urteil des Gerichts erster Instanz vom 20. April 1999, verbundene Rechtssachen T-305/94 und andere, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV gegen Kommission, Slg. 1999, II-931). Es ist darauf hinzuweisen, dass die Regel des Verbots der Doppelbestrafung sich auf gleichartige Sanktionen, in diesem Fall durch ein Strafgericht verhängte Strafen, bezieht.

      Nach Artikel 50 findet die Regel `ne bis in idem` nicht nur innerhalb der Gerichtsbarkeit eines Staates, sondern auch zwischen den Gerichtsbarkeiten mehrerer Mitgliedstaaten Anwendung. Dies entspricht dem Rechtsbesitzstand der Union; siehe die Artikel 54 bis 58 des Schengener Durchführungsübereinkommens und Urteil des Gerichtshofes vom 11. Februar 2003, Rechtssache C-187/01 Gözütok (Slg. 2003, I-1345), Artikel 7 des Übereinkommens über den Schutz der finanziellen Interessen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften sowie Artikel 10 des Übereinkommens über die Bekämpfung der Bestechung. Die klar eingegrenzten Ausnahmen, in denen die Mitgliedstaaten nach diesen Übereinkommen von der Regel `ne bis in idem` abweichen können, sind von der horizontalen Klausel des Artikels 52 Absatz 1 über die Einschränkungen abgedeckt. Was die in Artikel 4 des Protokolls Nr. 7 bezeichneten Fälle betrifft, nämlich die Anwendung des Grundsatzes in ein und demselben Mitgliedstaat, so hat das garantierte Recht dieselbe Bedeutung und dieselbe Tragweite wie das entsprechende Recht der EMRK.

      Quelle:
      Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Die Erläuterungen wurden ursprünglich unter der Verantwortung des Präsidiums des Konvents, der die Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union ausgearbeitet hat, formuliert. Sie wurden unter der Verantwortung des Präsidiums des Europäischen Konvents aufgrund der von diesem Konvent vorgenommenen Anpassungen des Wortlauts der Charta (insbesondere der Artikel 51 und 52) und der Fortentwicklung des Unionsrechts aktualisiert. Diese Erläuterungen haben als solche keinen rechtlichen Status, stellen jedoch eine nützliche Interpretationshilfe dar, die dazu dient, die Bestimmungen der Charta zu verdeutlichen.
    • Plaintiff: E.U.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      CZ:US:2016:2.US.143.16.1
    • Private complainant v. The Ministry of Defence
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Piedmont Regional Administrative Tribunal
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • T.W. v The Police Authority
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Director of 7th Customs of Independent Custom Groups of Piraeus v natural persons
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Council of State
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Customs
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • The Swedish Competitions Authority v Swedavia
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Criminal proceedings against Stefano Burzio.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Nith Chamber)
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2015:251
    • Procura della Repubblica v M
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      COURT (Fourth Chamber)
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Zoran Spasic
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      COURT (Grand Chamber)
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Pfleger and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Third Chamber)
      Typ:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2014:281
    • Procura della Repubblica v M
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General Sharpston
      Typ:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found

    • 18
      Oktober
      2023
      Civil society organisations struggle to maintain an environment safe from threats and attacks. FRA’s sixth annual update on civic space explores the challenges for organisations across the EU. While there has been significant development since FRA began monitoring the situation in 2018, civil society organisations remain under immense pressure. Abusive lawsuits and attacks against those involved in migrant search and rescue at sea are just some of the challenges identified. This report presents ways forward to protect civil society and human rights.
    • 5
      Oktober
      2023
      Since October 2018, FRA has been publishing regular updates on NGO ships involved in search and rescue (SAR) operations in the Mediterranean, and the status of legal proceedings against them. This latest update covers until the end of June 2023.
    • 29
      September
      2023
      Russia’s invasion of Ukraine posed new challenges for the EU. Millions were forced to flee the war. As a result of the scale of people’s displacement, the EU activated for the first time the Temporary Protection Directive (TPD). More than 1.3 million children sought international protection in the EU. This bulletin explores the respect, protection and fulfilment of the fundamental rights of displaced children and ways to safeguard their rights. The third in a series, this bulletin builds on the evidence in FRA’s Bulletin #1 and #2 on the experiences of displaced people seeking safety in the EU.
    • 13
      September
      2023
      Europe’s ageing population is ever-increasing, and our societies are becoming more digitalised. Many public services are now available online, with many more services in the process of being digitalised. But the digitalisation of public services poses a risk of exclusion for older persons. In this new report, FRA explores the impact of digitalisation on the fundamental rights of older persons. The report maps the current legislation, policies and practices fostering digital inclusion. It provides an overview of the laws at the national level that provide for equal access to public services, both online and offline. The findings show how Member States safeguard older person’s rights to access services undergoing digitalisation. It outlines how Member States can support digital skills and ensure older people can fully participate in public life.

    • Report / Paper / Summary
      6
      Juli
      2023
      Following yet another recent tragic shipwreck and loss of life, this short report sets out how the EU could meet its obligations to prevent more deaths at sea. As part of the work that the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) does on upholding fundamental rights on migration and asylum, this report calls for better protection for shipwreck survivors and prompt investigations. It sets out measures that EU Member States should take to improve search and rescue efforts and provide legal pathways to safety to prevent deaths at sea.
    • 11
      Juni
      2023
      Across the world, human rights defenders protect and uphold human rights in some of the most challenging situations. In some countries they face worrying levels of threats and attacks, intimidation and harassment. This report outlines how human rights defenders can enter and stay in the EU when they need protection. It suggests how EU institutions and Member States could use the flexibility in existing legal provisions and provide shelter for defenders who seek protection.
    • 24
      Mai
      2023
      This report provides a partial update on the findings of the 2017 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) report Surveillance by intelligence services: Fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU. It was prepared at the request of the European Parliament, which asked FRA to update its 2017 findings to support the work of its committee of inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware (PEGA).
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      31
      Januar
      2023
      Many cities throughout the European Union hosted people fleeing Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The EU currently faces the largest displacement of people in Europe since World War II. Since February 2022, over seven million people came to the EU. The arrival of such large numbers of people thrust cities and local governments to the forefront of the EU and its Member States’ relief work. This short publication provides a snapshot of cities’ initiatives to address this humanitarian crisis.
    • 13
      Dezember
      2022
      National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) continue to play a key role in upholding fundamental rights. FRA keeps track of the accreditation status and the mandates of the NHRIs. In 2022, the NHRI in Cyprus was upgraded to an ‘A-status’ institution. In addition, the mandates of six NHRIs changed to include child protection or the protection of LGBTI people.
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      15
      September
      2022
      Europe stands at a delicate moment in its history, facing a convergence of major tests. Each of them taken on their own is significant. Together, they pose profound questions about the political, economic, and societal future of the continent. This is a moment for strong commitment to put human rights at the heart of our vision for Europe’s future. It is also time to demonstrate our determination to work together to this end. Against this backdrop, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) brought together around sixty human rights leaders and experts from across the continent to discuss elements of a human rights vision for the future and to identify opportunities for action. A full conference report will be available soon, including the specific ideas and proposals which arose from the meeting. Meanwhile, this is a summary of the conclusions.