Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Articolul 50 - Dreptul de a nu fi judecat sau condamnat de două ori pentru aceeași infracțiune

Articolul 50 - Dreptul de a nu fi judecat sau condamnat de două ori pentru aceeași infracțiune

Nimeni nu poate fi judecat sau condamnat pentru o infracțiune pentru care a fost deja achitat sau condamnat în cadrul Uniunii, prin hotărâre judecătorească definitivă, în conformitate cu legea.

    • Text:

      Articolul 4 din Protocolul nr. 7 la CEDO are următorul text:

      `(1) Nimeni nu poate fi urmărit sau pedepsit penal de către jurisdicţiile aceluiaşi Stat pentru săvârşirea infracţiunii pentru care a fost deja achitat sau condamnat printr-o hotărâre definitivă conform legii şi procedurii penale ale acestui Stat.

      (2) Dispoziţiile paragrafului precedent nu împiedică redeschiderea procesului, conform legii şi procedurii penale a Statului respectiv, dacă fapte noi sau recent descoperite sau un viciu fundamental în cadrul procedurii precedente sunt de natură să afecteze hotărârea pronunţată.

      (3) Nicio derogare de la prezentul articol nu este îngăduită în temeiul art. 15 din convenţie`.

      Regula `non bis in idem` se aplică în dreptul Uniunii (a se vedea, în cadrul unei jurisprudenţe considerabile, hotărârea din 5 mai 1966, în cauzele 18/65 şi 35/65, Gutmann/Comisie, Rec. 1966, p. 150 şi într-o cauză recentă, hotărârea Tribunalului de Primă Instanţă din 20 aprilie 1999, în cauzele conexate T-305/94 şi altele, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV/Comisia, Rec. 1999, p. II-931). Se precizează faptul că regula ce interzice cumulul se referă la două sancţiuni de aceeaşi natură, în cazul de faţă penale.

      În conformitate cu articolul 50, regula `non bis in idem` nu se aplică numai în cadrul jurisdicţiei aceluiaşi stat, ci şi în cel al jurisdicţiilor mai multor state membre. Acest lucru corespunde acquis-ului; a se vedea articolele 54-58 din Convenţia privind punerea în aplicare a Acordului Schengen şi hotărârea Curţii de Justiţie din 11 februarie 2003 în cauza C-187/01 Gözütok (Rec. 2003, p. I-1345), articolul 7 din Convenţia privind protejarea intereselor financiare ale Comunităţii şi articolul 10 din Convenţia privind lupta împotriva corupţiei. Excepţiile limitate prin care aceste convenţii le permit statelor membre derogarea de la regula `non bis in idem` sunt acoperite de clauza orizontală din articolul 52 alineatul (1) privind restrângerile. În ceea ce priveşte situaţiile menţionate la articolul 4 din Protocolul nr. 7, şi anume aplicarea principiului în cadrul aceluiaşi stat membru, dreptul garantat are acelaşi înţeles şi domeniu de aplicare ca şi dreptul corespondent din CEDO.

      Source:
      Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Explicaţiile redate în continuare au fost redactate iniţial sub autoritatea prezidiului Convenţiei care a elaborat Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene. Acestea au fost actualizate sub autoritatea prezidiului Convenţiei Europene, având în vedere adaptarea de către respectiva Convenţie a textului cartei (în special la articolele 51 şi 52), precum şi evoluţia dreptului Uniunii. Cu toate că aceste explicaţii nu au valoare juridică în sine, acestea constituie un preţios instrument de interpretare destinat clarificării dispoziţiilor cartei.
    • Plaintiff: E.U.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      CZ:US:2016:2.US.143.16.1
    • Private complainant v. The Ministry of Defence
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Piedmont Regional Administrative Tribunal
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • T.W. v The Police Authority
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Director of 7th Customs of Independent Custom Groups of Piraeus v natural persons
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Council of State
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Customs
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • The Swedish Competitions Authority v Swedavia
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Criminal proceedings against Stefano Burzio.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Nith Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2015:251
    • Procura della Repubblica v M
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      COURT (Fourth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Zoran Spasic
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      COURT (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Pfleger and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Third Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2014:281
    • Procura della Repubblica v M
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General Sharpston
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found

    • 18
      October
      2023
      Civil society organisations struggle to maintain an environment safe from threats and attacks. FRA’s sixth annual update on civic space explores the challenges for organisations across the EU. While there has been significant development since FRA began monitoring the situation in 2018, civil society organisations remain under immense pressure. Abusive lawsuits and attacks against those involved in migrant search and rescue at sea are just some of the challenges identified. This report presents ways forward to protect civil society and human rights.
    • 5
      October
      2023
      Since October 2018, FRA has been publishing regular updates on NGO ships involved in search and rescue (SAR) operations in the Mediterranean, and the status of legal proceedings against them. This latest update covers until the end of June 2023.
    • 29
      September
      2023
      Russia’s invasion of Ukraine posed new challenges for the EU. Millions were forced to flee the war. As a result of the scale of people’s displacement, the EU activated for the first time the Temporary Protection Directive (TPD). More than 1.3 million children sought international protection in the EU. This bulletin explores the respect, protection and fulfilment of the fundamental rights of displaced children and ways to safeguard their rights. The third in a series, this bulletin builds on the evidence in FRA’s Bulletin #1 and #2 on the experiences of displaced people seeking safety in the EU.
    • 13
      September
      2023
      Europe’s ageing population is ever-increasing, and our societies are becoming more digitalised. Many public services are now available online, with many more services in the process of being digitalised. But the digitalisation of public services poses a risk of exclusion for older persons. In this new report, FRA explores the impact of digitalisation on the fundamental rights of older persons. The report maps the current legislation, policies and practices fostering digital inclusion. It provides an overview of the laws at the national level that provide for equal access to public services, both online and offline. The findings show how Member States safeguard older person’s rights to access services undergoing digitalisation. It outlines how Member States can support digital skills and ensure older people can fully participate in public life.

    • Report / Paper / Summary
      6
      July
      2023
      Following yet another recent tragic shipwreck and loss of life, this short report sets out how the EU could meet its obligations to prevent more deaths at sea. As part of the work that the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) does on upholding fundamental rights on migration and asylum, this report calls for better protection for shipwreck survivors and prompt investigations. It sets out measures that EU Member States should take to improve search and rescue efforts and provide legal pathways to safety to prevent deaths at sea.
    • 11
      June
      2023
      Across the world, human rights defenders protect and uphold human rights in some of the most challenging situations. In some countries they face worrying levels of threats and attacks, intimidation and harassment. This report outlines how human rights defenders can enter and stay in the EU when they need protection. It suggests how EU institutions and Member States could use the flexibility in existing legal provisions and provide shelter for defenders who seek protection.
    • 24
      May
      2023
      This report provides a partial update on the findings of the 2017 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) report Surveillance by intelligence services: Fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU. It was prepared at the request of the European Parliament, which asked FRA to update its 2017 findings to support the work of its committee of inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware (PEGA).
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      31
      January
      2023
      Many cities throughout the European Union hosted people fleeing Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The EU currently faces the largest displacement of people in Europe since World War II. Since February 2022, over seven million people came to the EU. The arrival of such large numbers of people thrust cities and local governments to the forefront of the EU and its Member States’ relief work. This short publication provides a snapshot of cities’ initiatives to address this humanitarian crisis.
    • 13
      December
      2022
      National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) continue to play a key role in upholding fundamental rights. FRA keeps track of the accreditation status and the mandates of the NHRIs. In 2022, the NHRI in Cyprus was upgraded to an ‘A-status’ institution. In addition, the mandates of six NHRIs changed to include child protection or the protection of LGBTI people.
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      15
      September
      2022
      Europe stands at a delicate moment in its history, facing a convergence of major tests. Each of them taken on their own is significant. Together, they pose profound questions about the political, economic, and societal future of the continent. This is a moment for strong commitment to put human rights at the heart of our vision for Europe’s future. It is also time to demonstrate our determination to work together to this end. Against this backdrop, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) brought together around sixty human rights leaders and experts from across the continent to discuss elements of a human rights vision for the future and to identify opportunities for action. A full conference report will be available soon, including the specific ideas and proposals which arose from the meeting. Meanwhile, this is a summary of the conclusions.