Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Artikel 50 - Rätt att inte bli dömd eller straffad två gånger för samma brott

Artikel 50 - Rätt att inte bli dömd eller straffad två gånger för samma brott

Ingen får lagföras eller straffas på nytt för en lagöverträdelse för vilken han eller hon redan har blivit frikänd eller dömd i unionen genom en lagakraftvunnen brottmålsdom i enlighet med lagen.

    • Text:

      Artikel 4 i protokoll nr 7 till Europakonventionen har följande lydelse:

      1. Ingen får lagföras eller straffas på nytt i en brottmålsrättegång i samma stat för ett brott för vilket han redan blivit slutligt frikänd eller dömd i enlighet med lagen och rättegångsordningen i denna stat.

      2. Bestämmelserna i föregående punkt skall inte utgöra hinder för att målet tas upp på nytt i enlighet med lagen och rättegångsordningen i den berörda staten om det föreligger bevis om nya eller nyuppdagade omständigheter eller om ett grovt fel begåtts i det tidigare rättegångsförfarandet vilket kan ha påverkat utgången i målet.

      3. Avvikelse får inte ske från denna artikel med stöd av artikel 15 i konventionen.`

      Regeln om att ingen får dömas två gånger för samma brott (`non bis in idem`) tillämpas i unionsrätten (bland en omfattande rättspraxis, se dom av den 5 maj 1966, Gutmann mot kommissionen, mål 18/65 och 35/65, Rec. 1966, s. 150, och bland senare mål förstainstansrättens dom av den 20 april 1999, förenade mål T-305/94 m.fl., Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV mot kommissionen, REG 1999, s. II-931). Det bör påpekas att den `icke-kumulativa` regeln avser kumulering av två påföljder av samma typ – här straffrättsliga.

      Enligt artikel 50 ska `non bis in idem`-regeln gälla inte endast i fråga om en och samma stats behörighet utan även mellan flera medlemsstaters behörigheter. Detta motsvarar unionens regelverk – se artiklarna 54–58 i konventionen om tillämpning av Schengenavtalet och domstolens dom av den 11 februari 2003 i mål C-187/01, Gözütok, (Rec. 2003, s. I-1345), artikel 7 i konventionen om skydd av Europeiska gemenskapernas finansiella intressen samt artikel 10 i konventionen om kamp mot korruption. De starkt begränsade undantag som finns och som innebär att medlemsstaterna enligt dessa konventioner får göra avsteg från `non bis in idem`-regeln omfattas av den övergripande klausulen i artikel 52.1 om begränsningar. När det gäller de situationer som avses i artikel 4 i protokoll nr 7, nämligen tillämpningen av denna princip inom en och samma medlemsstat, har den rättighet som garanteras samma innebörd och räckvidd som motsvarande rättighet i Europakonventionen.

      Source:
      Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Förklaringarna utarbetades ursprungligen på initiativ av presidiet för det konvent som utarbetade Europeiska unionens stadga om de grundläggande rättigheterna. De har uppdaterats på initiativ av Europeiska konventets presidium mot bakgrund av de justeringar av stadgetexten som gjorts av det senare konventet (särskilt artiklarna 51 och 52) samt unionsrättens vidare utveckling. Även om förklaringarna inte i sig har rättslig status, utgör de ett värdefullt tolkningsverktyg avsett att klargöra stadgans bestämmelser.
    • Plaintiff: E.U.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      CZ:US:2016:2.US.143.16.1
    • Private complainant v. The Ministry of Defence
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Piedmont Regional Administrative Tribunal
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • T.W. v The Police Authority
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Director of 7th Customs of Independent Custom Groups of Piraeus v natural persons
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Council of State
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Customs
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • The Swedish Competitions Authority v Swedavia
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Criminal proceedings against Stefano Burzio.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Nith Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2015:251
    • Procura della Repubblica v M
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      COURT (Fourth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Zoran Spasic
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      COURT (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Pfleger and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Third Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2014:281
    • Procura della Repubblica v M
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General Sharpston
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found

    • 18
      October
      2023
      Civil society organisations struggle to maintain an environment safe from threats and attacks. FRA’s sixth annual update on civic space explores the challenges for organisations across the EU. While there has been significant development since FRA began monitoring the situation in 2018, civil society organisations remain under immense pressure. Abusive lawsuits and attacks against those involved in migrant search and rescue at sea are just some of the challenges identified. This report presents ways forward to protect civil society and human rights.
    • 5
      October
      2023
      Since October 2018, FRA has been publishing regular updates on NGO ships involved in search and rescue (SAR) operations in the Mediterranean, and the status of legal proceedings against them. This latest update covers until the end of June 2023.
    • 29
      September
      2023
      Russia’s invasion of Ukraine posed new challenges for the EU. Millions were forced to flee the war. As a result of the scale of people’s displacement, the EU activated for the first time the Temporary Protection Directive (TPD). More than 1.3 million children sought international protection in the EU. This bulletin explores the respect, protection and fulfilment of the fundamental rights of displaced children and ways to safeguard their rights. The third in a series, this bulletin builds on the evidence in FRA’s Bulletin #1 and #2 on the experiences of displaced people seeking safety in the EU.
    • 13
      September
      2023
      Europe’s ageing population is ever-increasing, and our societies are becoming more digitalised. Many public services are now available online, with many more services in the process of being digitalised. But the digitalisation of public services poses a risk of exclusion for older persons. In this new report, FRA explores the impact of digitalisation on the fundamental rights of older persons. The report maps the current legislation, policies and practices fostering digital inclusion. It provides an overview of the laws at the national level that provide for equal access to public services, both online and offline. The findings show how Member States safeguard older person’s rights to access services undergoing digitalisation. It outlines how Member States can support digital skills and ensure older people can fully participate in public life.

    • Report / Paper / Summary
      6
      July
      2023
      Following yet another recent tragic shipwreck and loss of life, this short report sets out how the EU could meet its obligations to prevent more deaths at sea. As part of the work that the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) does on upholding fundamental rights on migration and asylum, this report calls for better protection for shipwreck survivors and prompt investigations. It sets out measures that EU Member States should take to improve search and rescue efforts and provide legal pathways to safety to prevent deaths at sea.
    • 11
      June
      2023
      Across the world, human rights defenders protect and uphold human rights in some of the most challenging situations. In some countries they face worrying levels of threats and attacks, intimidation and harassment. This report outlines how human rights defenders can enter and stay in the EU when they need protection. It suggests how EU institutions and Member States could use the flexibility in existing legal provisions and provide shelter for defenders who seek protection.
    • 24
      May
      2023
      This report provides a partial update on the findings of the 2017 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) report Surveillance by intelligence services: Fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU. It was prepared at the request of the European Parliament, which asked FRA to update its 2017 findings to support the work of its committee of inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware (PEGA).
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      31
      January
      2023
      Many cities throughout the European Union hosted people fleeing Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The EU currently faces the largest displacement of people in Europe since World War II. Since February 2022, over seven million people came to the EU. The arrival of such large numbers of people thrust cities and local governments to the forefront of the EU and its Member States’ relief work. This short publication provides a snapshot of cities’ initiatives to address this humanitarian crisis.
    • 13
      December
      2022
      National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) continue to play a key role in upholding fundamental rights. FRA keeps track of the accreditation status and the mandates of the NHRIs. In 2022, the NHRI in Cyprus was upgraded to an ‘A-status’ institution. In addition, the mandates of six NHRIs changed to include child protection or the protection of LGBTI people.
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      15
      September
      2022
      Europe stands at a delicate moment in its history, facing a convergence of major tests. Each of them taken on their own is significant. Together, they pose profound questions about the political, economic, and societal future of the continent. This is a moment for strong commitment to put human rights at the heart of our vision for Europe’s future. It is also time to demonstrate our determination to work together to this end. Against this backdrop, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) brought together around sixty human rights leaders and experts from across the continent to discuss elements of a human rights vision for the future and to identify opportunities for action. A full conference report will be available soon, including the specific ideas and proposals which arose from the meeting. Meanwhile, this is a summary of the conclusions.