Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Previous title

VI. Cím

Igazságszolgáltatás

Next title
Previous article

50. cikk - A kétszeres eljárás alá vonás és a kétszeres büntetés tilalma

Next article

50. cikk - A kétszeres eljárás alá vonás és a kétszeres büntetés tilalma

Senki sem vonható büntetőeljárás alá és nem büntethető olyan bűncselekményért, amely miatt az Unióban a törvénynek megfelelően már jogerősen felmentették vagy elítélték.

  • Text:

    Az EJEE hetedik kiegészítő jegyzőkönyvének 4. cikke a következő:

    `1. Ha valakit egy állam büntető törvényének és büntető eljárási törvényének megfelelően egy bűncselekmény kapcsán már jogerősen felmentettek vagy elítéltek, e személlyel szemben ugyanennek az államnak az igazságszolgáltatási szervei ugyane bűncselekmény miatt nem folytathatnak büntető eljárást, és vele szemben abban büntetést nem szabhatnak ki.

    2. Az előző bekezdés rendelkezései nem képezik akadályát annak, hogy az adott állam büntető törvényeinek és büntető eljárási törvényeinek megfelelően az eljárást újból megindítsák, ha új, vagy újólag feltárt tények, vagy az eljárás alapvető hibái természetüknél fogva kihatással vannak a meghozott ítéletre.

    3. A jelen cikk rendelkezéseitől az Egyezmény 15. cikkére hivatkozással nem lehet eltérni`.

    Az uniós jog alkalmazza a non bis in idem elvét (számos precedens közül lásd: a Bíróságnak a 18/65 és 35/65. sz. Gutman kontra Bizottság ügyben 1996. május 5-én hozott ítéletét EHBT 1996., 103. o.], illetve egy későbbi ügyben az Elsőfokú Bíróságnak a T-305/94. sz. és más, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV kontra Bizottság egyesített ügyekben 1999. április 20-án hozott ítéletét [EHBT 1999., II-931. o.]). Az anyagi halmazatot tiltó szabály két azonos természetű, azaz büntetőjogi szankció halmazatára vonatkozik.

    Az 50. cikknek megfelelően a non bis in idem elve nem csak egy adott állam joghatóságán belül, hanem több tagállam joghatósága között is érvényesül. Ez megfelel az uniós jog vívmányainak; lásd a Schengeni Egyezmény 54. és 58. cikkét, a Bíróságnak a C-187/01. sz. Gözütok-ügyben 2003. február 11-én hozott ítéletét (EBHT 2003., I-1345. o.), valamint az Európai Közösségek pénzügyi érdekeinek védelméről szóló egyezmény 7. cikkét és a korrupcióellenes küzdelemről szóló egyezmény 10. cikkét. Az említett egyezményekben foglalt rendkívül korlátozott számú kivételt, amely lehetővé teszi a tagállamok számára a non bis in idem elvétől való eltérést, a Charta 52. cikke (1) bekezdésének korlátozásokra vonatkozó horizontális záradéka határozza meg. A hetedik kiegészítő jegyzőkönyv 4. cikkében említett helyzetet illetően, vagyis az elvnek ugyanazon tagállamon belüli alkalmazását illetően, a biztosított jognak az EJEE-ben foglalt megfelelő joggal azonos a tartalma és terjedelme.

    Source:
    Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    Az alábbi magyarázatok eredetileg az Európai Unió Alapjogi Chartáját kidolgozó Konvent elnökségének irányításával kerültek megfogalmazásra. A magyarázatok naprakésszé tétele az Európai Konvent elnökségének felelőssége mellett, az elnökségnek a Charta szövegéhez (nevezetesen az 51. és 52. cikkéhez) tett kiigazításainak megfogalmazása, valamint az uniós jog további fejlődése fényében történt. Bár a magyarázatok nem bírnak jogi erővel, az értelmezés értékes eszközei, amelyek célja a Charta rendelkezéseinek megvilágítása.
  • Czech Republic / Constitutional Court / II. ÚS 143/16
    Plaintiff: E.U.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    CZ:US:2016:2.US.143.16.1
  • Ireland / Regional Administrative Tribunal / 179
    Private complainant v. The Ministry of Defence
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Piedmont Regional Administrative Tribunal
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Sweden / The Supreme Administrative Court / 1161-14
    T.W. v The Police Authority
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Greece / Council of State / 1741/2015
    Director of 7th Customs of Independent Custom Groups of Piraeus v natural persons
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Council of State
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Customs
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Sweden / Market Court / MD 2015:4
    The Swedish Competitions Authority v Swedavia
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • CJEU Case C-497/14 / Order
    Criminal proceedings against Stefano Burzio.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Nith Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    Justice, freedom and security
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2015:251
  • CJEU - C 398/12 / Judgment
    Procura della Repubblica v M
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    COURT (Fourth Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • CJEU - C 129/14 PPU / Judgment
    Zoran Spasic
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    COURT (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • CJEU - Case C-390/12 / Judgment
    Pfleger and Others
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Third Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2014:281
  • CJEU - C 398/12 / Opinion
    Procura della Repubblica v M
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General Sharpston
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found

  • Periodic updates / Series
    Civil society
    Support for human rights systems and defenders
    18
    October
    2023

    Protecting civil society – Update 2023

    Civil society organisations struggle to maintain an environment safe from threats and attacks. FRA’s sixth annual update on civic space explores the challenges for organisations across the EU. While there has been significant development since FRA began monitoring the situation in 2018, civil society organisations remain under immense pressure. Abusive lawsuits and attacks against those involved in migrant search and rescue at sea are just some of the challenges identified. This report presents ways forward to protect civil society and human rights.
  • Periodic updates / Series
    Asylum, migration and borders
    Access to asylum
    Borders and information systems
    Irregular migration, return and immigration detention
    5
    October
    2023

    June 2023 update - Search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean and fundamental rights

    Since October 2018, FRA has been publishing regular updates on NGO ships involved in search and rescue (SAR) operations in the Mediterranean, and the status of legal proceedings against them. This latest update covers until the end of June 2023.
  • Periodic updates / Series
    Asylum, migration and borders
    Access to asylum
    Child protection
    Trafficking and labour exploitation
    29
    September
    2023

    The Russian war of aggression against Ukraine - Children fleeing Ukraine finding protection in the EU - Bulletin 3

    Russia’s invasion of Ukraine posed new challenges for the EU. Millions were forced to flee the war. As a result of the scale of people’s displacement, the EU activated for the first time the Temporary Protection Directive (TPD). More than 1.3 million children sought international protection in the EU. This bulletin explores the respect, protection and fulfilment of the fundamental rights of displaced children and ways to safeguard their rights. The third in a series, this bulletin builds on the evidence in FRA’s Bulletin #1 and #2 on the experiences of displaced people seeking safety in the EU.
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    Children, youth and older people
    Equality, non-discrimination and racism
    13
    September
    2023

    Fundamental rights of older persons: ensuring access to public services in digital societies

    Europe’s ageing population is ever-increasing, and our societies are becoming more digitalised. Many public services are now available online, with many more services in the process of being digitalised. But the digitalisation of public services poses a risk of exclusion for older persons. In this new report, FRA explores the impact of digitalisation on the fundamental rights of older persons. The report maps the current legislation, policies and practices fostering digital inclusion. It provides an overview of the laws at the national level that provide for equal access to public services, both online and offline. The findings show how Member States safeguard older person’s rights to access services undergoing digitalisation. It outlines how Member States can support digital skills and ensure older people can fully participate in public life.

  • Report / Paper / Summary
    Asylum, migration and borders
    6
    July
    2023

    Preventing and responding to deaths at sea: what the European Union can do

    Following yet another recent tragic shipwreck and loss of life, this short report sets out how the EU could meet its obligations to prevent more deaths at sea. As part of the work that the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) does on upholding fundamental rights on migration and asylum, this report calls for better protection for shipwreck survivors and prompt investigations. It sets out measures that EU Member States should take to improve search and rescue efforts and provide legal pathways to safety to prevent deaths at sea.
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    Civil society
    Support for human rights systems and defenders
    11
    June
    2023

    Protecting human rights defenders at risk: EU entry, stay and support

    Across the world, human rights defenders protect and uphold human rights in some of the most challenging situations. In some countries they face worrying levels of threats and attacks, intimidation and harassment. This report outlines how human rights defenders can enter and stay in the EU when they need protection. It suggests how EU institutions and Member States could use the flexibility in existing legal provisions and provide shelter for defenders who seek protection.
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    Data protection
    Data protection, privacy and new technologies
    24
    May
    2023

    Surveillance by intelligence services: Fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU - 2023 update

    This report provides a partial update on the findings of the 2017 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) report Surveillance by intelligence services: Fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU. It was prepared at the request of the European Parliament, which asked FRA to update its 2017 findings to support the work of its committee of inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware (PEGA).
    Watch
    Download
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    31
    January
    2023

    How did cities welcome displaced people from Ukraine?

    Many cities throughout the European Union hosted people fleeing Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The EU currently faces the largest displacement of people in Europe since World War II. Since February 2022, over seven million people came to the EU. The arrival of such large numbers of people thrust cities and local governments to the forefront of the EU and its Member States’ relief work. This short publication provides a snapshot of cities’ initiatives to address this humanitarian crisis.
  • Periodic updates / Series
    National human rights systems and bodies
    Support for human rights systems and defenders
    13
    December
    2022

    December 2022 update - NHRI accreditation status and mandates

    National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) continue to play a key role in upholding fundamental rights. FRA keeps track of the accreditation status and the mandates of the NHRIs. In 2022, the NHRI in Cyprus was upgraded to an ‘A-status’ institution. In addition, the mandates of six NHRIs changed to include child protection or the protection of LGBTI people.
  • Report / Paper / Summary
    15
    September
    2022

    Putting human rights at the heart of Europe’s future - Summary meeting report

    Europe stands at a delicate moment in its history, facing a convergence of major tests. Each of them taken on their own is significant. Together, they pose profound questions about the political, economic, and societal future of the continent. This is a moment for strong commitment to put human rights at the heart of our vision for Europe’s future. It is also time to demonstrate our determination to work together to this end. Against this backdrop, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) brought together around sixty human rights leaders and experts from across the continent to discuss elements of a human rights vision for the future and to identify opportunities for action. A full conference report will be available soon, including the specific ideas and proposals which arose from the meeting. Meanwhile, this is a summary of the conclusions.