Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Artikolu 48 - Il-preżunzjoni ta' innoċenza u d-dritt għad-difiża

Artikolu 48 - Il-preżunzjoni ta' innoċenza u d-dritt għad-difiża

1. Kull imputat għandu jkun preżunt innoċenti sakemm jinstab ħati skond il-liġi. 2. Għandu jiġi ggarantit ir-rispett għad-drittijiet tad-difiża ta' kull imputat.

    • Text:

      L-Artikolu 48 huwa l-istess bħall-Artikolu 6(2) u (3) tal-KEDB, li jinqara kif ġej:

      `2. Kull min ikun akkużat b'reat kriminali għandu jiġi meqjus li jkun innoċenti sakemm ma jiġix pruvat ħati skond il-liġi.

      3. Kull min ikun akkużat b'reat kriminali għandu d-drittijiet minimi li ġejjin:

      a) li jkun infurmat minnufih, b'lingwa li jifhem u bid-dettall, dwar in-natura u r-raġuni ta' l-akkuża kontra tiegħu;

      b) li jkollu żmien u faċilitajiet xierqa għall-preparazzjoni tad-difiża tiegħu;

      ċ) li jiddefendi ruħu persunalment jew permezz ta' assistenza legali magħżula minnu stess jew, jekk ma jkollux mezzi biżżejjed li jħallas l-assistenza legali, din għandha tingħata lilu b'xejn meta l-interessi tal-ġustizzja jeħtieġu hekk;

      d) li jeżamina jew li jara li jiġu eżaminati xhieda kontra tiegħu u li jottjeni l-attendenza u l-eżami ta' xhieda favur tiegħu taħt l-istess kundizzjonijiet bħax-xhieda kontra tiegħu;

      e) li jkollu assistenza b'xejn ta' interpretu jekk ma jkunx jifhem jew jitkellem il-lingwa użata fil-qorti`.

      Skond l-Artikolu 52(3), dan id-dritt għandu l-istess sens u ambitu bħad-dritt garantit mill-KEDB.

      Source:
      Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Dawn l-ispjegazzjonijiet ġew imħejjija oriġinarjament taħt ir-responsabbiltà tal-Praesidium tal-Konvenzjoni li abbozza l-Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea. Huma ġew aġġornati taħt ir-responsabbiltà tal-Praesidium tal-Konvenzjoni Ewropea, fid-dawl ta' l-aġġustamenti li saru għat-test tal-Karta minn dik il-Konvenzjoni (partikolarment fl-Artikoli (51 U 52) u ta' l-evoluzzjoni fil-liġi ta' l-Unjoni. Għalkemm dawn l-ispjegazzjonijiet m'għandhomx fihom infushom l-istatus ta' liġi, huma mezz siewi ta' interpretazzjoni intiż sabiex ikunu ċċarati d-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Karta.
    • PI v Landespolizeidirektion Tirol
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Sixth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Enterprise
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2019:383
    • Criminal proceedings against Ivan Gavanozov
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2019:312
    • Criminal proceedings against Gianluca Moro
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2019:95
    • IK
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (First Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:991
    • IK
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:890
    • Lis, Lancet and Chemielewski v. Regional Court in Warsaw and others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      High Court of Justice - Queen's Bench Division - Administrative Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security, Asylum and migration
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • F. F. (F. F.), N. P. (N. P.) ir A. P. (A. P.),. v. Migration Department under the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Lithuania (Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Criminal proceedings against Emil Milev
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (First Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:732
    • UBS Europe SE and Alain Hondequin and Others v DV and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Fifth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Economic and monetary affairs
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:715
    • UBS Europe SE and Alain Hondequin and Others v DV and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Economic and monetary affairs
      ECLI (European case law identifier):

    47 results found

    • Tο Σύνταγμα της Κυπριακής Δημοκρατίας
      Pajjiż:
      Cyprus

      Αρθρο 12
      4. Ο κατηγορούμενος δι’ αδίκημά τι θεωρείται αθώος, μέχρις ου αποδειχθή ένοχος συμφώνως προς τον νόμον. 5. Πας κατηγορούμενος δι’ αδίκημά τι έχει τα ακόλουθα κατ’ ελάχιστον όρον δικαιώματα:
      (α) να πληροφορηθή εις καταληπτήν υπ’ αυτού γλώσσαν αμέσως και λεπτομερώς την φύσιν και τους λόγους της εις αυτόν αποδιδομένης κατηγορίας,
      (β) να έχη επαρκή χρόνον και διευκόλυνσιν διά την προπαρασκευήν της υπερασπίσεως αυτού,
      (γ) να υπερασπίζη εαυτόν αυτοπροσώπως ή διά συνηγόρου της εκλογής αυτού ή, εφ’ όσον δεν έχη επαρκή προς αμοιβήν του συνηγόρου μέσα, να παρέχηται εις αυτόν δωρεάν νομική αρωγή, όταν τούτο επιβάλλη το συμφέρον της δικαιοσύνης,
      (δ) να εξετάζη ή να προκαλή την εξέτασιν μαρτύρων κατηγορίας και να ζητή την προσέλευσιν και εξέτασιν μαρτύρων υπερασπίσεως υπό τους αυτούς όρους τους ισχύοντας ως προς τους μάρτυρας κατηγορίας,
      (ε) να έχη δωρεάν συμπαράστασιν διερμηνέως, εφ’ όσον δεν δύναται να κατανοήση ή να ομιλή την εν τω δικαστηρίω χρησιμοποιουμένην γλώσσαν.

    • Constitution of the Republic of Croatia
      Pajjiż:
      Croatia

      Article 28
      Everyone is presumed innocent and may not be held guilty of a criminal offence until such guilt is proven by a binding court judgment.

      Article 29
      (2)In the case of suspicion or accusation of a criminal offence, the suspected, accused or indicted
      person shall be entitled:
      – to be informed in detail and in a language he/she understands, within the shortest possible
      term, of the nature and grounds for the charges against him/her and the evidence incriminating
      him/her,
      – to have adequate time and opportunity to prepare his/her defence,
      – to defence counsel and unrestricted communication therewith, and to be informed of this
      right,
      – to mount his/her own defence independently or with the assistance of a defence counsel of
      his/her own choice, and if he/she lacks the resources to engage such counsel, to have free
      counsel provided under the conditions specified by law,
      – to be present at his/her trial insofar as he/she is at the disposal of the court,
      – to interrogate or to arrange for interrogation of witnesses for the prosecution and to demand
      the attendance and questioning of defence witnesses under the same conditions which apply to
      witnesses for the prosecution,
      – to assistance by an interpreter free of charge insofar as he/she does not understand the
      language used in the court.
      (3)An admission of guilt may not be coerced from a suspected, accused or indicted individual.
      (4)Evidence obtained illegally may not be admitted in court proceedings.

      Article 27
      The legal profession, as an autonomous and independent service, shall provide everyone with legal aid in compliance with law.

    • Ustav Republike Hrvatske
      Pajjiż:
      Croatia

      Članak 28.
      Svatko je nedužan i nitko ga ne može smatrati krivim za kazneno djelo dok mu se pravomoćnom sudskom presudom ne utvrdi krivnja.

      Članak 29.
      (2) U slučaju sumnje ili optužbe zbog kažnjivog djela osumnjičenik, okrivljenik ili optuženik ima pravo:
      – da u najkraćem roku bude obaviješten potanko i na jeziku koji razumije o naravi i razlozima optužbe koja se diže protiv njega i o dokazima koji ga terete,
      – da ima odgovarajuće vrijeme i mogućnost za pripremu obrane,
      – na branitelja i nesmetano uspostavljanje veze s braniteljem, i s tim pravom mora biti upoznat,
      – da se brani sam ili uz branitelja po vlastitom izboru, a ako nema dovoljno sredstava da plati branitelja, ima pravo na besplatnog branitelja pod uvjetom propisanim zakonom,
      – da mu se sudi u njegovoj nazočnosti, ukoliko je dostupan sudu,
      – da ispituje ili dade ispitati svjedoke optužbe i da zahtijeva da se osigura nazočnost i ispitivanje svjedoka obrane pod istim uvjetima kao i svjedoka optužbe,
      – na besplatnu pomoć tumača ako ne razumije ili ne govori jezik koji se upotrebljava na sudu.

      (3)Osumnjičenik, okrivljenik i optuženik ne smije se siliti da prizna krivnju.

      (4)Dokazi pribavljeni na nezakonit način ne mogu se uporabiti u sudskom postupku.

      Članak 27.
      Odvjetništvo kao samostalna i neovisna služba osigurava svakome pravnu pomoć, u skladu sa zakonom.

    • Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria
      Pajjiż:
      Bulgaria

      Art. 30 [...] (4) Everyone shall be entitled to legal counsel from the moment of detention or from the moment of being charged.(5) Everyone shall be entitled to meet his legal counsel in private. The confidentiality of such communication shall be inviolable. Art. 31 [...] (2) No one shall be forced to plead guilty, and no one shall be convicted solely by virtue of confession.(3) A defendant shall be considered innocent until proven otherwise by a final verdict.(4) The rights of a defendant shall not be restricted beyond what is necessary for the purposes of a fair trial.Art. 56Everyone shall have the right to legal defence whenever his rights or legitimate interests are violated or endangered. He shall have the right to be accompanied by legal counsel when appearing before an agency of the State.

    • КОНСТИТУЦИЯ на Република България
      Pajjiż:
      Bulgaria

      Чл. 30 [...] (4) Всеки има право на адвокатска защита от момента на задържането му или на привличането му като обвиняем.(5) Всеки има право да се среща насаме с лицето, което го защитава. Тайната на техните съобщения е неприкосновена. Чл. 31 [...] (2) Никой не може да бъде принуждаван да се признае за виновен, нито да бъде осъден само въз основа на неговото самопризнание.(3) Обвиняемият се смята за невинен до установяване на противното с влязла в сила присъда.(4) Не се допускат ограничения на правата на обвиняемия, надхвърлящи необходимото за осъществяване на правосъдието.Чл. 56Всеки гражданин има право на защита, когато са нарушени или застрашени негови права или законни интереси. В държавните учреждения той може да се явява и със защитник.

    • Konvention zum Schutze der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten
      Pajjiż:
      Austria

      Artikel 6 (2) Bis zum gesetzlichen Nachweis seiner Schuld wird vermutet, daß der wegen einer strafbaren Handlung Angeklagte unschuldig ist.

    • The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
      Pajjiż:
      Austria

      Article 6 2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found