Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Artikolu 30 - Il-protezzjoni fil-każ ta' tkeċċija inġusta

Artikolu 30 - Il-protezzjoni fil-każ ta' tkeċċija inġusta

Kull ħaddiem għandu d-dritt għall-protezzjoni kontra tkeċċija inġusta, skond il-liġi ta' l-Unjoni u l-liġijiet u l-prattiċi nazzjonali.

    • Text:

      Dan l-Artikolu huwa ispirat mill-Artikolu 24 tal-Karta Soċjali riveduta. Ara wkoll id-Direttiva 2001/23/KE dwar il-salvagwardja tad-drittijiet ta' l-impjegati fil-każ ta' trasferimenti ta' impriżi, u d-Direttiva 80/987/KEE dwar il-protezzjoni ta' l-impjegati f'każ ta' l-insolvenza ta' min iħaddimhom, kif emendata bid-Direttiva 2002/74/KE.

      Source:
      Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ta’ l-Unjoni Ewropea C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Dawn l-ispjegazzjonijiet ġew imħejjija oriġinarjament taħt ir-responsabbiltà tal-Praesidium tal-Konvenzjoni li abbozza l-Karta tad-Drittijiet Fundamentali ta' l-Unjoni Ewropea. Huma ġew aġġornati taħt ir-responsabbiltà tal-Praesidium tal-Konvenzjoni Ewropea, fid-dawl ta' l-aġġustamenti li saru għat-test tal-Karta minn dik il-Konvenzjoni (partikolarment fl-Artikoli (51 U 52) u ta' l-evoluzzjoni fil-liġi ta' l-Unjoni. Għalkemm dawn l-ispjegazzjonijiet m'għandhomx fihom infushom l-istatus ta' liġi, huma mezz siewi ta' interpretazzjoni intiż sabiex ikunu ċċarati d-dispożizzjonijiet tal-Karta.
    • TJ v Balga Srl.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Seventh Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2020:441
    • Ordinary Court of Rome
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Anonymi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis) v. Ypourgos Ergasias, Koinonikis Asfalisis kai Koinonikis Allilengyis
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2016:972
    • Anonymi Geniki Etairia Tsimenton Iraklis (AGET Iraklis) v Ypourgos Ergasias, Koinonikis Asfalisis kai Koinonikis Allilengyis
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2016:429
    • Former civil servant v state entity (anonymised)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Curia
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Grima Janet Nisttahuz Poclava v Jose María Ariza Toledano (Taberna del Marqués)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Tenth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2015:60
    • K.M.C v Hungary
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      European Court of Human Rights
      Deciding body:
      European Court of Human Rights
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD001955411
    • Ovido Rodríguez Mayor and Others v v Herencia yacente de Rafael de las Heras Dávila and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Mono Car Styling SA v Dervis Odemis and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      EU:C:2009:24
    • Ovidio Rodríguez Mayor and Others v Succession vacante de Rafael de las Heras Dávila and Sagrario de las Heras Dávila
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Fourth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Employment and social policy
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2009:770

    19 results found

    • Czech Labour Code No.262/2006 Coll.
      Pajjiż:
      Czechia

      Part II, Chapter IV deals with the termination of the work relationship.

    • Employment Rights Act 1996
      Pajjiż:
      United Kingdom

      Part X Unfair dismissal
      Chapter I Right not to be unfairly dismissed
      Section 94 The right.
      (1) An employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed by his employer.

    • Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia
      Pajjiż:
      Slovenia

      Article 66 The state shall create opportunities for employment and work, and shall ensure the protection of both by law.

    • Ustava Republike Slovenije
      Pajjiż:
      Slovenia

      66. člen Država ustvarja možnosti za zaposlovanje in za delo ter zagotavlja njuno zakonsko varstvo.

    • Constitution of the Slovak Republic
      Pajjiż:
      Slovakia

      Article 36 Employees have the right to just and satisfying working conditions. The law guarantees, above all (…) b) protection against arbitrary dismissal and discrimination at the work place (…).

    • Ústava Slovenskej republiky
      Pajjiż:
      Slovakia

      Čl. 36 Zamestnanci majú právo na spravodlivé a uspokojujúce pracovné podmienky. Zákon im zabezpečuje najmä (...) b) ochranu proti svojvoľnému prepúšťaniu zo zamestnania a diskriminácii v zamestnaní. (...)

    • Constituição da República Portuguesa
      Pajjiż:
      Portugal

      Artigo 53.º (Segurança no emprego) É garantida aos trabalhadores a segurança no emprego, sendo proibidos os despedimentos sem justa causa ou por motivos políticos ou ideológicos.

    • Constitution of the Portuguese Republic
      Pajjiż:
      Portugal

       Article 53 (Job security) The right of workers to security of employment is guaranteed. Dismissals without just cause or for political or ideological reasons are prohibited.

    • Employment and Industrial Relations Act, Cap. 452 of the Laws of Malta, 2002
      Pajjiż:
      Malta

      Part V - Termination of Contracts of Service

    • Code du Travail
      Pajjiż:
      Luxembourg

      (dans sa teneur modifiée au 11 novembre 2009)

    • Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania
      Pajjiż:
      Lithuania

      Article 49. Every working person shall have the right to rest and leisure, as well as to annual paid leave. The length of working time shall be established by law.

    • Lietuvos Respublikos Konstitucija
      Pajjiż:
      Lithuania

      49 straipsnis. Kiekvienas dirbantis žmogus turi teisę turėti poilsį ir laisvalaikį, taip pat kasmetines mokamas atostogas. Darbo laiko trukmę apibrėžia įstatymas.

    • Labour Law
      Pajjiż:
      Latvia

      Chapter 29 Protection of Employees when Terminating Employment Legal Relationships Chapter 30 Obligations of an Employer when Dismissing an Employee

    • Protection of employment (exceptional collective redundancies and related matters) act 2007
      Pajjiż:
      Ireland

      An act to make provision, consequent on the conclusion of the ten-year framework social partnership agreement 2006-2015 known as “towards 2016”, for the establishment of a redundancy panel and the reference to it of certain proposed collective redundancies and for related action by the Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, including the obtaining from the labour court of opinions on the nature of proposed collective redundancies; (...)

    • Unenumerated constitutional right identified by the Irish Courts
      Pajjiż:
      Ireland

      In the case of Re Hagughey [1971] I.R. 217, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court stated: '… in proceedings before any tribunal (this Courts emphasis) where a party to the proceedings is on risk of having his good name, or his person or property, or any of his personal rights jeopardized, the proceedings may be correctly classed as proceedings which may affect his rights, and in compliance with the Constitution the State, either by its enactments or through the courts, must outlaw any procedures which will restrict or prevent the party concerned from vindicating these rights.'

    • Constitution of Finland
      Pajjiż:
      Finland

      Section 18 The right to work and the freedom to engage in commercial activity (...) No one shall be dismissed from employment without a lawful reason.

    • Suomen perustuslaki
      Pajjiż:
      Finland

      18 § Oikeus työhön ja elinkeinovapaus (...) Ketään ei saa ilman lakiin perustuvaa syytä erottaa työstä.

    • Constitution of the Republic of Croatia
      Pajjiż:
      Croatia
    • Labour Code
      Pajjiż:
      Bulgaria

      Chapter XVI - Termination of Employment Relationship deals with protection from dismissal.

    1 results found

    • The European Pillar of Social Rights

      7. Information about employment conditions and protection in case of dismissals
      Workers have the right to be informed in writing at the start of employment about their rights and obligations resulting from the employment relationship, including on probation period.
      Prior to any dismissal, workers have the right to be informed of the reasons and be granted a reasonable period of notice. They have the right to access to effective and impartial dispute resolution and, in case of unjustified dismissal, a right to redress, including adequate compensation.

    0 results found