This paper discusses the evolution of European Court of Human Rights case law relating
to hate crime, providing an update on the most recent rulings. Approaching hate crime
from a fundamental rights perspective, it shows how Member State authorities’ duty to
effectively investigate the bias motivation of crimes flows from key human rights
instruments, such as the European Convention on Human Rights.
Această lucrare prezintă evoluția jurisprudenței Curții Europene a Drepturilor
Omului cu privire la infracțiunile motivate de ură, oferind o actualizare în ceea
ce privește cele mai recente hotărâri. Abordarea infracțiunilor motivate de ură
dintr-o perspectivă a drepturilor fundamentale arată cum datoria autorităților
statelor membre de a investiga în mod eficient motivarea bazată pe prejudecată
a infracțiunilor decurge din instrumentele cheie ale drepturilor omului, cum ar fi
Convenția europeană a drepturilor omului.
This report outlines the main findings of FRA’s second survey on Jewish people’s experiences with hate crime, discrimination and antisemitism in the European Union – the biggest survey of Jewish people ever conducted worldwide. Covering 12 EU Member States, the survey reached almost 16,500 individuals who identify as being Jewish. It follows up on the agency’s first survey, conducted in seven countries in 2012.
This Opinion by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) aims to inform
the European Parliament’s position on the legislative proposal on the European Border and
Coast Guard (EBCG) presented by the European Commission on 12 September 2018.
In diesem Handbuch wird erläutert, was Profiling ist, welcher Rechtsrahmen ihm zugrunde liegt und weshalb Profiling von rechtlicher Seite nicht nur die Grundrechte wahren muss, sondern auch von entscheidender Bedeutung für eine wirksame Polizeiarbeit und ein wirksames Grenzmanagement ist. Das Handbuch enthält außerdem praktische Anweisungen zur Vermeidung von unrechtmäßigem Profiling bei Einsätzen von Polizei und Grenzmanagement.
Ο παρών οδηγός εξηγεί τι είναι η κατάρτιση προφίλ, τα νομικά πλαίσια που τη διέπουν και τον λόγο για τον οποίο η νόμιμη κατάρτιση προφίλ δεν είναι μόνο απαραίτητη για τη συμμόρφωση με τα θεμελιώδη δικαιώματα, αλλά και καίριας σημασίας για την αποτελεσματική αστυνόμευση και διαχείριση των συνόρων. Ο οδηγός παρέχει επίσης πρακτικές οδηγίες σχετικά με τρόπους αποφυγής της παράνομης κατάρτισης προφίλ στο πλαίσιο αστυνομικών επιχειρήσεων και επι-χειρήσεων διαχείρισης των συνόρων.
This guide explains what profiling is, the legal frameworks that regulate it, and why conducting profiling lawfully is both necessary to comply with fundamental rights and crucial for effective policing and border management. The guide also provides practical guidance on how to avoid unlawful profiling in police and border management operations.
Le présent guide explique le profilage, les cadres juridiques qui le régissent et les raisons pour
lesquelles le profilage licite est à la fois nécessaire pour garantir le respect des droits fondamentaux
et essentiel à l’efficacité des opérations de police et de gestion des frontières.
In deze gids wordt uitgelegd wat profilering is, welke wettelijke kaders van toepassing zijn en waarom een rechtmatige toepassing van profilering niet alleen nodig is om aan de grondrechten te voldoen, maar ook van cruciaal belang is voor een doeltreffende ordehandhaving en grensbeheer.
Zivilgesellschaftliche Organisationen spielen in Demokratien eine entscheidende Rolle, und
die Bedeutung ihrer Arbeit wird in internationalen rechtlichen und politischen Dokumenten
weithin anerkannt. Sie sind jedoch in ihrer täglichen Arbeit mit zahlreichen Hindernissen
konfrontiert. Das vorliegende Dokument ergänzt den Bericht vom Januar 2018 auf Grundlage der Ergebnisse
einer Online-Konsultation, die im September 2018 mit der Plattform für Grundrechte durchgeführt wurde.
Civil society organisations play a critical role in democracies, and the importance of their work is widely recognised in international legal and policy documents. However, they face many obstacles when it comes to their day-to-day work. Based on the results of an online consultation with FRA's civil society network, the Fundamental Rights Platform (FRP), in September 2018, this paper complements the January 2018 report.
Les organisations de la société civile (OSC) jouent un rôle essentiel dans les démocraties
et l’importance de leur travail est largement reconnue dans les documents juridiques et
politiques internationaux. Toutefois, elles sont confrontées à de nombreux obstacles dans
leur travail quotidien. Sur la base des résultats d’une consultation en ligne réalisée avec la FRP en septembre 2018,
le présent document complète le rapport de janvier 2018.
The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights has been collecting relevant data since September 2015, in light of the increasing numbers of refugees, asylum seekers and migrants entering the EU. This report focuses on the fundamental rights situation of people arriving in Member States particularly affected by large migration movements. The countries covered are: Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and Sweden.
Antisemitism can be expressed in the form of verbal and physical attacks, threats,
harassment, discrimination and unequal treatment, property damage and graffiti or other
forms of speech or text, including on the internet. The present report provides an overview of data on antisemitism as recorded by
international organisations and by official and unofficial sources in the 28 European
Union (EU) Member States, based on their own definitions and categorisations.
The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights’ 2018 Fundamental Rights Forum
brought together more than 700 human rights champions at a time of
widening social divisions and increasingly polarised politics across
Europe.
Le Forum des droits 2018 de l’Agence des
droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne
a rassemblé plus de 700 champions des
droits de l’homme à l’heure où les divisions
sociales s’élargissent et où les politiques
sont de plus en plus polarisées en Europe.
Като един съвременен каталог на правата на човека, Хартата съдържа много
права, които не присъстват в установените харти на правата, и действително
изглежда добре на хартия. Хората, запознати с основните принципи на правото
на Съюза, обикновено цитират текста от Хартата, който гласи, че тя винаги
е обвързваща за ЕС, а за държавите членки — само когато „прилагат право на ЕС“.
Какво обаче означава тази често цитирана формулировка от член 51 на Хартата?
Jako velmi moderní soubor lidských práv obsahující mnoho práv, která se nenacházejí
v zavedených listinách práv, je Listina základních práv skutečně kvalitním
dokumentem. Ti, kteří jsou obeznámeni s hlavními zásadami práva EU, jsou obvykle
schopni rychle odrecitovat, že listina je pro EU závazná vždy a pro členské státy jen
výhradně, pokud „uplatňují právo Unie“. Co však toto často citované znění článku 51
listiny vlastně znamená?
Som et meget moderne menneskerettighedskatalog med en masse rettigheder, som
ikke findes i gældende borgerrettighedslovgivning, ser chartret særdeles godt ud
på papiret. De, der er bekendt med de vigtigste principper i EU-retten, kan normalt
hurtigt udtale sig om, at chartret altid er bindende for EU, og for medlemsstaterne
kun når de »gennemfører EU-retten«. Men hvad betyder denne ofte citerede vending
fra chartrets artikel 51 egentlig?
As a very modern human rights catalogue containing many rights not found in established bills of rights, the Charter indeed looks good on paper. Those familiar with the
main principles of EU law can usually quickly recite that the Charter is always binding
on the EU, and binding on Member States only when they are “implementing EU law”.
But what does this often-quoted language from Article 51 of the Charter actually mean?