Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

50. pants - Tiesības netikt divreiz tiesātam vai sodītam krimināllietā par to pašu noziedzīgo nodarījumu

50. pants - Tiesības netikt divreiz tiesātam vai sodītam krimināllietā par to pašu noziedzīgo nodarījumu

Nevienu nedrīkst atkārtoti tiesāt vai sodīt krimināllietā par nodarījumu, par kuru viņš saskaņā ar tiesību aktiem Savienībā jau ticis attaisnots vai notiesāts ar galīgu spriedumu.

    • Text:

      ECK 7. protokola 4. pants ir šāds:

      `1. Nevienu nedrīkst atkārtoti tiesāt vai sodīt krimināllietā tajā pašā valstī par nodarījumu, par kuru viņš saskaņā ar šīs valsts tiesību aktiem un soda izciešanas noteikumiem jau ticis attaisnots vai notiesāts ar galīgu spriedumu.

      2. Iepriekšējā punkta noteikumi neliedz lietu izskatīt atkārtoti saskaņā ar attiecīgās valsts tiesību aktiem un soda izciešanas noteikumiem, ja ir jauni pierādījumi vai atklājušies jauni apstākļi, vai ja iepriekšējā procesā ir pieļautas būtiskas kļūdas, kas varēja ietekmēt lietas iznākumu.

      3. Atkāpes no šā panta nav atļautas saskaņā ar Konvencijas 15. pantu.`.

      `Non bis in idem` princips attiecas uz Savienības tiesību aktiem (sk. vienu no daudziem precedentiem – 1996. gada 5. maija spriedumu apvienotajās lietās 18/65 un 35/65 Gutmann/Komisija, Recueil, 1966., 150. lpp., un nesenu lietu, Pirmās instances tiesas 1999. gada 20. aprīļa spriedumu apvienotajās lietās T-305/94 u.c., Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV/Komisija, Recueil, 1999., II–931. lpp.). Noteikums, kas aizliedz saskaitīšanu, attiecas uz divu vienādu veidu sodu saskaitīšanu, tas ir, uz krimināltiesībās paredzētajiem sodiem.

      Saskaņā ar 50. pantu `non bis in idem` princips attiecas ne tikai uz vienas valsts tiesām, bet arī uz sodiem, ko piespriež vairāku dalībvalstu tiesas. Tas atbilst Savienības acquis; sk. Šengenas konvencijas 54. līdz 58. pantu un Tiesas 2003. gada 11. februāra spriedumu lietā C-187/01 Gözütok, Recueil, 2003., I–1345. lpp., 7. pantu Konvencijā par Eiropas Kopienu finansiālo interešu aizsardzību un 10. pantu Konvencijā par korupcijas apkarošanu. Atsevišķie izņēmumi, kas paredzēti minētajās konvencijās un ļauj dalībvalstīm atkāpties no `non bis in idem` principa, ir ietverti Hartas 52. panta 1. punkta horizontālajā klauzulā par ierobežojumiem. Attiecībā uz situācijām, kas minētas 7. protokola 4. pantā, proti, principa piemērošanu vienā dalībvalstī, garantēto tiesību nozīme un darbības joma ir tāda pati kā attiecīgajām tiesībām ECK.

      Source:
      Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Šie paskaidrojumi ir sagatavoti Eiropas Savienības Pamattiesību hartu izstrādājušā Konventa prezidija vadībā. Tie ir atjaunināti Eiropas Konventa prezidija vadībā, ņemot vērā Konventa izdarītos Hartas teksta (jo īpaši 51. un 52. panta) precizējumus un Savienības tiesību turpmāku attīstību. Kaut arī šiem paskaidrojumiem nav juridiska spēka, tie ir vērtīgi interpretācijas līdzekļi, kas paredzēti Hartas noteikumu izskaidrošanai.
    • Pfleger and Others
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2013:747
    • Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      General Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2013:105
    • Texdata Software GmbH
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2013:50
    • Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      European Court of Justice
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Toshiba Corporation et al v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže (Czech competition authority)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Tomasović v. Croatia
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      European Court of Human Rights
      Deciding body:
      Court (First Section)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD005378509
    • Bureau d'intervention et de restitution belge v Beneo-Orafti SA
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      European Court of Human Rights
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0210JUD001493903
    • Criminal proceedings against Leopold Henri Van Esbroeck v Openbaar Ministerie
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      European Court of Justice
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      EU:C:2006:16
    • Criminal proceedings against Leopold Henri Van Esbroeck v Openbaar Ministerie
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      European Court of Justice
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      EU:C:2005:630

    0 results found

    0 results found

    0 results found

    • 24
      May
      2023
      This report provides a partial update on the findings of the 2017 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) report Surveillance by intelligence services: Fundamental rights safeguards and remedies in the EU. It was prepared at the request of the European Parliament, which asked FRA to update its 2017 findings to support the work of its committee of inquiry to investigate the use of Pegasus and equivalent surveillance spyware (PEGA).
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      31
      January
      2023
      Many cities throughout the European Union hosted people fleeing Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The EU currently faces the largest displacement of people in Europe since World War II. Since February 2022, over seven million people came to the EU. The arrival of such large numbers of people thrust cities and local governments to the forefront of the EU and its Member States’ relief work. This short publication provides a snapshot of cities’ initiatives to address this humanitarian crisis.
    • 13
      December
      2022
      National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) continue to play a key role in upholding fundamental rights. FRA keeps track of the accreditation status and the mandates of the NHRIs. In 2022, the NHRI in Cyprus was upgraded to an ‘A-status’ institution. In addition, the mandates of six NHRIs changed to include child protection or the protection of LGBTI people.
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      15
      September
      2022
      Europe stands at a delicate moment in its history, facing a convergence of major tests. Each of them taken on their own is significant. Together, they pose profound questions about the political, economic, and societal future of the continent. This is a moment for strong commitment to put human rights at the heart of our vision for Europe’s future. It is also time to demonstrate our determination to work together to this end. Against this backdrop, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) brought together around sixty human rights leaders and experts from across the continent to discuss elements of a human rights vision for the future and to identify opportunities for action. A full conference report will be available soon, including the specific ideas and proposals which arose from the meeting. Meanwhile, this is a summary of the conclusions.
    • Periodic updates / Series
      26
      August
      2022
      Since 2014, FRA has been publishing an annual update of the forced return monitoring systems EU Member States have set up under Article 8 (6) of the EU’s Return Directive (2008/115/EC). This overview describes different indicators for an effective forced return monitoring system. It includes the organisation responsible for monitoring forced return, the number of operations monitored in 2021, the phases of monitored return operations, the number of staff trained and working as monitors, and whether the monitoring body issued public reports about their monitoring.
    • 20
      June
      2022
      The EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) regularly collects data on the operations of NGO vessels involved in search and rescue in the Mediterranean. This includes any legal proceedings against them, as well as on any difficulties in disembarking migrants in safe ports. The International Organization for Migration estimates that from January to 15 June 2022 about 842 people died or went missing while crossing the Mediterranean Sea to reach Europe to escape war or persecution, or to pursue a better life. This is an average of five people per day.
    • Report / Paper / Summary
      22
      March
      2022
      In view of the human rights situation since the beginning of the war in Ukraine on 24 February 2022 and the large number of persons seeking protection in the European Union (EU), the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) dispatched, as a first step, a team composed of Agency staff who speak the national languages and with expertise on migration, child protection, equality and non-discrimination and Roma inclusion to observe and collect evidence on the evolving situation. The team reported daily to the EU mechanism for preparedness and crises management on migration (Migration Preparedness and Crisis Blueprint).
    • 8
      February
      2022
      In 2015 and 2016, the numbers of unaccompanied children arriving in Europe increased dramatically, straining national guardianship systems. This report looks at how EU Member States, as well as North Macedonia and Serbia, have adapted their guardianship systems for unaccompanied children since that time.
    • Opinion / Position Paper
      11
      January
      2022
      asAS
    • Easy-to-read report
      11
      January
      2022
      asdasd