Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

CJEU Case C-234/18 / Opinion

Komisia za protivodeystvie na koruptsiyata i za otnemane na nezakonno pridobitoto imushtestvo v BP and Others
Policy area
Justice, freedom and security
Deciding body type
Court of Justice of the European Union
Deciding body
Advocate General
Type
Opinion
Decision date
31/10/2019
ECLI (European case law identifier)
ECLI:EU:C:2019:920

Carta drepturilor fundamentale a Uniunii Europene

Title VI: Justice

Article 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence

VIEW FULL CASE
  • CJEU Case C-234/18 / Opinion

    Key facts of the case:

    Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Proceedings for the confiscation of illegally obtained assets in the absence of a criminal conviction — Directive 2014/42/EU — Scope — Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA.

    Outcome of the case:

    In the light of all the foregoing considerations, I suggest that the Court should answer the questions raised by the Sofyski Gradski Sad (Sofia City Court, Bulgaria) as follows:

    ‘Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property does not preclude confiscation proceedings such as those pending before the national court, where those proceedings are not ‘in relation to a criminal offence’ and their issue does not depend upon a criminal conviction.’

  • Paragraphs referring to EU Charter (original language)

    4) Article 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’) ( 4 ) provides that ‘everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law’.

    5) In accordance with Article 51(1), the provisions of the Charter ‘are addressed to the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union … and to the Member States only when they are implementing [EU] law’.

    ...

    72) Article 5 of Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA reiterates the obligation to respect the presumption of innocence. The presumption of innocence is recognised by Article 48(1) of the Charter.

    ...

    74) For the reasons that I have set out above, confiscation proceedings such as those pending before the referring court cannot be considered to be ‘in relation to a criminal offence’ falling within the scope of the Framework Decision. Article 5 of the Framework Decision and Article 48(1) of the Charter are therefore inapplicable in the present case.