Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

eu-charter

EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Airteagal 50 - An ceart chun nach ndéanfar duine a thriail ná a phionósú faoi dhó in imeachtaí coiriúla i ngeall ar an gcion coiriúil céanna

Airteagal 50 - An ceart chun nach ndéanfar duine a thriail ná a phionósú faoi dhó in imeachtaí coiriúla i ngeall ar an gcion coiriúil céanna

Ní dhlífear aon duine a thriail ná a phionósú athuair in imeachtaí coiriúla i ngeall ar chion ar éigiontaíodh nó ar ciontaíodh é nó í go críochnaitheach san Aontas i ngeall air cheana i gcomhréir leis an dlí.

    • Text:

      Mar seo a leanas atá in Airteagal 4 de Phrótacal Uimh. 7 a ghabhann leis an CECD:

      `1. Ní féidir aon duine a thriail ná a phionósú athuair in imeachtaí coiriúla faoin dlínse sa Stát céanna i ngeall ar chion a bhfuil sé éigiontaithe nó ciontaithe go críochnaitheach i ngeall air cheana i gcomhréir leis an dlí agus an nós imeachta coiriúil sa Stát sin.

      2. Ní choiscfidh na forálacha sa mhír roimhe seo ar an gcás a athoscailt i gcomhréir leis an dlí agus an nós imeachta coiriúil sa Stát i dtrácht, má tá fianaise nua nó fíorais atá fionnta go nua nó má tá éalang bunúsach sna himeachtaí roimhe sin a d'fhéadfadh fearadh ar an mbreithiúnas a tugadh.

      3. Níl aon mhaolú ceadaithe ar an Airteagal seo faoi Airteagal 15 sa Choinbhinsiún.`

      Tá feidhm ag riail an `non bis in idem` maidir le dlí an Aontais (féach, i measc na raidhse fasach, breithiúnas an 5 Bealtaine 1996, Cásanna Ceangailte 18/65 agus 35/65, Gutmann v. Coimisiún [1966] ECR 149 agus cás a bhí ann le déanaí, breith ón gCúirt Chéadchéime an 20 Aibreán 1999, Cásanna Ceangailte T305/94 agus eile, Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV v. Coimisiún [1999] ECR II-931). Carnadh dhá phionós den chineál céanna atá i gceist sa riail a thoirmisceann an carnadh, eadhon pionóis dlí choiriúil.

      I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 50, ní hé amháin go bhfuil feidhm ag riail an `non bis in idem` laistigh de dhlínse aon Stáit amháin ach tá feidhm aici freisin idir dhlínsí roinnt Ballstát. Freagraíonn sé seo don acquis i ndlí an Aontais; féach Airteagail 54 go 58 de Choinbhinsiún Schengen agus breithiúnas na Cúirte Breithiúnais an 11 Feabhra 2003, C–187/01 Gözütok (2003, ECR I-1345), Airteagal 7 den Choinbhinsiún maidir le Leasa Airgeadais na gComhphobal Eorpach a chosaint agus Airteagal 10 den Choinbhinsiún maidir leis an éillitheacht a chomhrac. Na heisceachtaí fíortheoranta atá sna Coinbhinsiúin sin a cheadaíonn do na Ballstáit riail an `non bis in idem` a mhaolú, clúdaítear sa chlásal cothrománach in Airteagal 52(1) den Chairt maidir le teorainneacha iad. Maidir leis na cásanna dá dtagraítear in Airteagal 4 de Phrótacal Uimh. 7, eadhon ina ndéantar an prionsabal a chur i bhfeidhm laistigh den Bhallstát céanna, is ionann brí agus raon feidhme don cheart ráthaithe agus don cheart comhfhreagrach sa CECD.

      TEIDEAL VII – FORÁLACHA GINEARÁLTA A bhFUIL LÉIRIÚ AGUS CUR I bhFEIDHM NA CAIRTE FAOINA RIALÚ

      Source:
      Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
      Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
      Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.
    • Criminal proceedings against Dániel Bertold Lada
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Second Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:532
    • Public Prosecutor v. accused
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Supreme Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Economic and monetary affairs
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:NL:HR:2018:901
    • XC, YB, ZA in the presence of the Principal Public Prosecutor
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:391
    • AY.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:317
    • Criminal proceedings against Luca Menci
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:197
    • Garlsson Real Estate SA and Others v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:193
    • Enzo Di Puma v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) (C-596/16), Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) v Antonio Zecca (C-597/16)
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Court (Grand Chamber)
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:192
    • Criminal proceedings against Dániel Bertold Lada.
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      Court of Justice of the European Union
      Deciding body:
      Advocate General
      Type:
      Opinion
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      ECLI:EU:C:2018:65
    • Ordinary Court of Monza
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Constitutional Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
    • H.K. v the Prosecutors office
      Decision date:
      Deciding body type:
      National Court/Tribunal
      Deciding body:
      Supreme Court
      Type:
      Decision
      Policy area:
      Justice, freedom and security
      ECLI (European case law identifier):
      EE:RK:2017:1.17.4924.22131

    21 results found

    • 7th Additional Protocolo the The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
      Tír:
      Austria

      Article 4 (1) No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again in criminal proceedings under the jurisdiction of the same State for an offence for which he has already been finally acquitted or convicted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of that State.

    0 results found

    0 results found