Key facts of the case:

Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for antidepressant medicinal products containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient citalopram — Concept of restriction of competition ‘by object’ — Potential competition — Generic medicinal products — Barriers to market entry resulting from the existence of patents — Agreements concluded between a patent holder and a generic undertaking — Error of law — Error of assessment — Rights of defence — Fines

Results (sanctions) and key consequences of the case:

THE GENERAL COURT (Ninth Chamber) hereby:

1. Dismisses the action;
2. Orders Generics (UK) Ltd to pay the costs.