Help us make the FRA website better for you!

Take part in a one-to-one session and help us improve the FRA website. It will take about 30 minutes of your time.

YES, I AM INTERESTED NO, I AM NOT INTERESTED

CJEU - C 476/12 / Opinion

Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund
Deciding body type
Court of Justice of the European Union
Deciding body
Advocate General Sharpston
Type
Opinion
Decision date
13/02/2014

Χάρτης των Θεμελιωδών Δικαιωμάτων της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

  • CJEU - C 476/12 / Opinion
    Key facts of the case:
     
    (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria))
     
    (Framework Agreement on part-time work – Principle of non-discrimination – Collective agreement providing for a dependent child allowance – Allowance paid pro-rata to part-time workers)
     
    Results (sanctions) and key consequences of the case:
     
    Conclusion
     
    53. Accordingly, for the reasons that I have given I suggest that the Court should answer only the first question referred by the Oberster Gerichtshof, Austria, in the following terms:
     
    It is appropriate, within the meaning of Clause 4.2 of the Framework Agreement annexed to Council Directive 97/81/EC concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, to apply the principle of pro rata temporis to a dependent child allowance provided for in a collective agreement, where there is no statutory obligation on the parties to make provision for such an allowance.
  • Paragraphs referring to EU Charter

     

    49-52